It isn't just about thinking about how to evaluate the results, but also how to evaluate the types of results you are getting. Most academic/scholarly databases are populated by content that might have a high level of evidence because it has gone through a peer-review process, but many of the academic/scholarly resources have also been criticized for gate keeping and perpetuating a heteronormative, western, white, male-centric voice.
So when you are reviewing your results you might want to ask yourself - is there a perspective or a voice missing here?
If the answer is yes, how could you layer your research to search resources that are more patient-centric or non-traditional in addition to the scholarly/academic resources?
You need to think about the:
Use these tips to evaluate the websites of organizations. Keep in mind that these are only a starting point and not guaranteed to be failsafe in every situation.
|Does the information presented on the website appear truthful / impartial, or incorrect / biased?
|How is the organization funded? Hint: Government-funded, private donations?
|Who runs / founded the organization? What can you find out about them? Hint: Can you find more through a web search?
What is the stated or implied mission of the organization? Hint: Look at the "About" page.
|Is this a well-known, well-regarded organization? Have you heard of it before?
|Does the URL end in: .edu, .gov, .org? Note: This is not always full proof. URLs of all types can be bought.
Scientific research takes time and, in many cases, is measuring very specific variables. Exploratory studies usually need confirmation from further research. In addition, the media may misrepresent "conclusions." With this in mind, drawing concrete conclusions from only one study and citing news sources in your work can be problematic (though news sources are not always invalid).
To help you better understand and cite the science:
For more information check out these titles:
For more information on conducting studies with human subjects watch this video:
Studies need to be funded. Think about asking yourself these questions to evaluate the information presented and to check for any biases
|Does the information presented appear truthful / impartial or incorrect / biased?
|Who funded this study? Was it government funded, private donations, a private company? Hint: Government-funded, private donations?
|Who was in charge of the study / who runs the entity that funded it? What Information can you find on them? Hint: Can you find more through a web search?
|What is the stated purpose of the study and mission of the entity that funded it?
|What is the reputation of the authors and the funders? Are they well-known, well-regarded? Have you heard of them before? What information can you find on them?
Quick Tip: Many times clicking on an author, publication, or organization name in a database (like PubMed) record will take you to more information on the entity. However, you can also find information by running a web search.